Eum et qui quaerat voluptatem.

Does anyone else find that reading reviews is sometimes more entertaining than the actual reading of the book? This is especially true with a lot of children's books. This book mentions the "potty". Heart attack alert! The book has a character that - jokingly - "imagines" the parent(s) as an evil sorcerer. I bet if an experiment was conducted murderers have had a book like this in their part at some point! I can't get over how uptight people are - namely parents. Get over it! With all of the things wrongs with this world - this country - and all of the things we have to worry about is the word 'potty' seriously that bad? Does that really even make it on the scale of worrisome things? Believe me, I'm all for calling out things that need to be called out. Read my reviews are any genre and you'll see that. But I tend to only do this with it's necessary. Not over a bathroom joke. Not over dumb things. I can't count the number of times I've played imaginary games with my daughter where I'm the witch or dragon or some other evil characters. Just as I can't count the number of times I've been a good witch or a queen or some good character. And the same can be said - both ways - about her. Check back in 15 or 20 years - I doubt she'll be a murderer/pervert/molester/etc. Now I'll put these idiotic things out of my mind and concentrate on the book. This is one instance when a book actually deserves the praise it gets. Don't get me wrong - it's nothing to scream about - but it's a good book, with good characters, in a good series, by a good author with great illustrations. Pinkalicious has a fantastic imagination which I believe should always be encouraged. I loved the joke about Peter stepping in unicorn poop. (This is mostly because I don't have any sticks up my butt.) I love the playful, back and forth banter between Pinkalicious and Peter also. Kann really came up with some good but simple stories with the series and she definitely has talent with illustratin